Steve Collins' blog, Small Ritualcarried this description a few months' back of what culture watchers describe as a Third Place:
'Third Places' are neither home nor workplace, but somewhere between. Places to meet, socialise, relax, hang out, work away from the office. Places to eat and drink without pressure to consume or move on. The 'third place' is epitomised by the modern coffee shop, with its sofas and newspapers - a revival of its 18th century role - or by the internet cafe.
...
Of course, in many ways this is a new name for the role that cafes have long performed in Mediterranean life. But the 'third place' is not focussed on the act of eating and drinking in the fashion of traditional cafes, restaurants, bars and pubs. The food or drink one consumes is the entry fee, not the point. The 'third place' is a living room, but not in someone's house; a workplace, but not in someone's office.
The reason the post is there (and why it was drawn to my attention) is - does this represent a feel that we ought to be looking to fill with our church buildings in any way? And if so, how? And then, is there a way that a Jesus-shaped Third Place will look or feel or function differently from, say, Starbucks?
Recent Comments